

Work and Love
Entertaining and Engaging Experience of a Modern Pioneer
If you loved "Little House on the Prairie" you'll love thisWhile telling her 30 year history of growing French varietal grapes (which people said couldn't be done), the author allows us to experience the grit behind the glamour in all its (pardon me) juicy details.
As in all successful memoirs, we get a chance to live someone else's life, imagine what it would be like to follow our dream as singlemindedly as she did, and rejoice when dreams come true. We also get to see the price that is exacted. Because Louisa Hargrave keeps us by her side, I stayed up until 2 AM to finish the book. I put it down feeling touched, informed, and inspired.


Gives new understanding to her sources of inspirationLouisa May Alcott was born in 1832 to a freethinking teacher, Bronson Alcott, and a Boston blueblood, Abigail May Alcott. Although Abigail (known as Abba) came from a wealthy family, she received little inheritance, and her family soon grew tired of bailing out Bronson from his financial problems. For much of Louisa's early childhood, the family lived in abject poverty. Both parents worked in the abolition movement and in other attempts at social reform. Their friends included many famous transcendentalist thinkers of the day, such as Emerson and Thoreau. Johnston briefly describes transcendentalism, but not in enough detail that the reader will wind up with a lasting understanding of this nature-based philosophy.
Sections of this biography dealing with Bronson's unconventional teaching ideas and techniques and his struggles to maintain a teaching post were perhaps the most fascinating. The most recent film adaptation of "Little Women" alludes to some of these problems when one of Meg's society friends comments that her father's school had to close because he admitted a black girl as a student. "Louisa May" provides a few further details on this incident, which actually occurred, noting that the child may have been the daughter of free blacks who knew the Alcotts through the abolition work. Bronson also found himself out of a teaching job for focusing on philosophy rather than the three Rs, including sex education in his curriculum, and preaching his own religious beliefs to his students.
While Bronson's educational approach cost him jobs in America, a book published by his assistant made him famous in England. Following a visit to that country, he returned to Massachusetts with several like-minded hangers-on and decided to found a utopian farm. Charles Lane, his chief ally in this effort, encouraged Bronson to a life of abstinence. Lane's monk-like approach to life included rigid lessons for the Alcott girls, meals consisting mostly of bread, potatoes, and water eaten without plates (the Alcotts already were vegetarians), and ultimately an attempt to separate Bronson from his family.
Johnston's description of how Abba managed to turn things around for the family is inspiring and contradicts stereotypes that many have about 19th century women's submissiveness to their husbands. Reading "Louisa May" left me longing for more information about Bronson and Abba Alcott, and their unconventional lives.
Like Jo in "Little Women," Louisa sought to help support her family as she got older. She did sewing, cleaned houses, taught children and, despite discouraging publishers, sold short stories. When the Civil War broke out, Louisa volunteered as a nurse. Her nursing experience proved pivotal in her life in several ways: "Hospital Sketches," based on her letters home, established her as a writer. Her hard work as a nurse, however, destroyed her health. Although not clear from "Louisa May," Louisa worked only three weeks as a nurse before going home sick.
The sections about her writing her famous children's books are less fascinating than the chapters on her early life, perhaps because it's hard to read about Louisa's struggles with poor health. At this point, Johnston briefly describes the plots, mentions which publisher the book was written for, and a few other details about what was going on in Louisa's life during its writing. Johnston could have given better context to Louisa's financial success. Stating that she earned $1,000 a year seems like an improvement over the $30 a year the family struggled to survive on during her childhood, but for readers unfamiliar with mid-19th century wages, it would be hard to see this sum as representing financial security.
I was surprised at how quickly I read "Louisa May." It had sat on my shelf for years before I finally picked it up, and then I read it practically nonstop. My primary disappointment was its lack of footnotes and its lack of a broader bibliography. I wanted to know more and I wanted Johnston's help in pointing me in that direction. Then I noticed that the biography was written for "11 & Up" and understood. I certainly didn't get the impression from the writing style, that the book was geared to younger readers.
Overall, I enjoyed "Louisa May" very much, and have new respect for her as an independent woman who set out to accomplish goals and lead a life that would have been somewhat unusual for women in her day-and did everything she set out to do!
Excellent!!

I don't believe you could give a better gift. . .
The Cuckoo Clock by Mrs. Molesworth,et al

Good Story
It was a great book
What's so wrong with spin offs ?

Pure drivel
An amazing book for teens AND adults
A great Book for teens

An excellent mystery!!
Read this it's good!
One of the BEST books I've ever readHe hunts her like a wild rabbit-- in a convent, a mental institution and all over Europe. He is cunning and shows up at the most incredulous moments (if it were a movie you wouldn't believe it) but Alcott explains how these impossibilities happen and it all makes sense.
This book is intriguing, will have you breathless and literally on the edge of your seat, and will make you cry. If it's the last thing you do, buy this book.


A kaleidoscope of fragments.Ostensibly, this is the intriguing story of Louisa, a young German Aryan who marries Gabor, a Hungarian Jew, as World War II is breaking out. But it is equally the story of her feisty mother-in-law Nora, the primary speaker of the narrative, who decides to emigrate to Israel in 1949. The reader learns of the problems each woman has faced in Hungary during the Holocaust, her family history, her involvement in intellectual and cultural life, and her personal relationships. It is a book of enormous, epic reach.
One of the difficulties of developing a story like this in fragments, however, is that the reader is often so busy connecting ideas that s/he remains somewhat distanced from the characters, being forced to accumulate information about them, rather than partipating in the action with them. The characters become players on a stage, in a drama which is not completed until the end of the book. Despite substantial background information, I never felt that I really knew Louisa and Nora or "got inside" their heads enough to be able to understand them or predict how they would behave. Their motivations are often unclear because the fragment of the story which explains motivation appears later in the book. The deliberate parallels between Louisa and Nora and the Biblical story of Ruth and Naomi give depth and scope to their relationship, but they do not fully explain it.
Ultimately, I found this novel thoughtful, enlightening, and even important, but it didn't capture my heart. Its unique approach to the Holocaust story, its slice-of-life pictures of early Israel, its themes, and its "big picture," while truly admirable, do not generate a great deal of warmth or lead to complete characters which linger long in the reader's memory--at least, this reader's. I wish it had been so.
A fine debut novelZelitch has done an admirable job of characterization, from gritty Nora, to refined but resourceful Louisa, to Nora's idealistic cousin Bela, to Nora's measurement-obsessed husband Janos. This story unfolds at a leisurely pace that never bores; the narrative is full of details that give everything - and everyone - life. Although, as noted by other reviewers, the point-of-view shifts can be disconcerting at first, it was clear to this reader that Nora, not an omniscient narrator, was imagining and embellishing scenes she could never have known first hand in an effort to understand herself how she came to be in the new Jewish homeland with Louisa.
Readers who expect a page-turner should look elsewhere, but those who appreciate the richness of literary fiction should find much to admire.
Excellent piece of fictionIn 1949 Nora, accompanied by her daughter in law, Louisa immigrates to Israel. However, her cousin fails to meet her at the Haifa docks. Nora and Louisa live in a camp where Holocaust survivors treat the younger woman with hatred and contempt. Willing to convert to Judaism, Louisa remains an abomination to the embittered survivors of Europe.
LOUISA, the retelling of the biblical story of Ruth, is an extraordinary work because Simone Zelitch provides perceptiveness into the parallel stories. Readers will feel a sense of time and place through the characters. Readers obtain a feel for the turmoil of the 1930s and 1940s in Hungary as well as a taste of 1949 Israel. The characters are drawn relatively simplistically and unsympathetically, but surprisingly that provides deeper insight into relationships, especially that of Nora and Louisa. The ultimate accolade to the author is that the audience will take a fresh look at the Ruth-Naomi tale.
Harriet Klausner


different from hardcover edition
The most gorgeous garden book available!

A Very Colorful CookbookEdna Lewis is an old Virginian, raised in Freetown, a small farm community founded by her grandfather shortly after his emancipation from slavery. The narratives introducing each food chapter, and the comments that accompany each recipe, are reminiscences from her childhood and insights into southern sensibility, and they are delightful: " Summertime is just nothing without boiled corn on the cob. When I was younger, for dinner, corn would be a separate course, which we would eat after the main part of the meal when the dishes were cleared away. After all, you really can't eat anything else if you are concentrating on corn", and "In the South there's a big stir about how chess pie got its name. Some say it's because when a guest would say 'My, this a good pie, what is it called?' the answer would be 'jes pie'."
The disappointment for me, a near-vegetarian, was not only in the relative paucity of vegetable recipes, but in seeing how heavily she relies on meat in general-- not just as a course in itself, but as a means of deriving flavor in other dishes. She says,"I still use pork shoulder, country ham, bacon, and streak-of-lean to flavor many dishes", and," I wouldn't feel my kitchen was well-stocked if I did not have ham on hand to flavor dishes." A full third of the cookbook is devoted to meat, fish and game. And much of that is not necessarily your ordinary fare-- there are more recipes for rabbit, for instance, than for beef. And quite a bit of quail, pheasant, duck, guinea hen, etc. There's even head cheese, eel (including how to skin them), and squirrel. The squeamish may want to skip this section altogether. She also obtains flavor from the liberal use of fat. I was surprised by how many recipes, even vegetable ones, call for a stick of butter or a cup of heavy cream.
Still and all, this cookbook is a unique treat-- informative, inspiring, and just a pleasure to read. The tomato soup with basil, crispy cornsticks, creamed scallions, and summer berry pudding are all excellent. Of the latter she says, "When I made this for the James Beard Tribute Dinner in New York one year, Mayor Koch had five helpings." Next to try is the chocolate souffle, "one of the recipes for which I am best known."


The Girlhood Diary of Louisa May Alcott: 1843-1846
There's nothing I don't like about The Vineyard.. I like Hargrave's voice--direct,
unadorned, humorous, clear. I like the sense we get of how hard the work was. She doesn't complain--much--but she does describe her daily life in enough detail that a reader has a vivid, physical sense of the vintner's life. Also, of how tough it is
to run a business according to one's own lights. Her amateurishness--good
sense, not bad sense--at the outset gives way to know-how, but only as she
figured things out. And since the Hargrave wines can't be tasted as we turn the
pages, we have to take her word for the standards to which she and her husband aspired. And that's just what we do; her writing is that persuasive. She doesn't preen, never tries to show us her best profile, so we hear about her worries and annoyances, as well as about her joys.
The book is not all grapes and weather worries. Her children make frequent welcome appearances; her account of her marriage, its beginning, its long happy middle and its end, sounds pretty true-to-life. (If there were messy details, Hargrave doesn't get into them. Hargrave's ability to tell the hard truths and yet take the high road is one of her strengths as a writer.) Readers won't feel they know Alex as well as they know Louisa and their children but it's a sastisfying read nonetheless. On balance, a well-rounded portrait of a couple of people and their business.